Quincy McCoy v. Leroy Cartledge
Petitioner - Appellant: QUINCY MARQUETTE MCCOY
Respondent - Appellee: LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden
Case Number: 10-6470
Filed: March 30, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 27, 2010 Quincy McCoy v. Leroy Cartledge

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 403128405 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998327167-2] Originating case number: 0:08-cv-03747-HMH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998491497] [10-6470]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Quincy McCoy v. Leroy Cartledge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: QUINCY MARQUETTE MCCOY
Represented By: Quincy Marquette McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: LEROY CARTLEDGE, Warden
Represented By: William Edgar Salter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?