Alvin Gregory v. Michael Coleman
Petitioner - Appellant: ALVIN LEE GREGORY
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL V. COLEMAN, Acting Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Case Number: 10-6518
Filed: April 9, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 2, 2010 Alvin Gregory v. Michael Coleman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 402916733 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:02-cv-00472. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998392586] [10-6518]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alvin Gregory v. Michael Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ALVIN LEE GREGORY
Represented By: Alvin Lee Gregory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: MICHAEL V. COLEMAN, Acting Warden, Mount Olive Correctional Complex
Represented By: Charles Patrick Houdyschell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?