Daniel Davis v. US
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL PROFIT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHATMAN, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant, DEE, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant, DOCTOR PHILLIPS, in his individual and official capacity as Physician, KERRY MODERN, in his individual and official capacity as Counselor and X-RAY TECHNICIAN, in his individual and official capacity as X-Ray Technician
Case Number: 10-6865
Filed: June 22, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 6, 2010 Daniel Davis v. US

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 403016753 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:08-ct-03130-FL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998440203] [10-6865]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Davis v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: DANIEL PROFIT DAVIS
Represented By: Daniel Profit Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Matthew Fesak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CHATMAN, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DEE, in her individual and official capacity as Physician's Assistant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DOCTOR PHILLIPS, in his individual and official capacity as Physician
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: KERRY MODERN, in his individual and official capacity as Counselor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: X-RAY TECHNICIAN, in his individual and official capacity as X-Ray Technician
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?