Jimmy Simons v. Gene Johnson
Petitioner - Appellant: JIMMY EUGENE SIMONS
Respondent - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Case Number: 10-6988
Filed: July 19, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 15, 2010 Jimmy Simons v. Gene Johnson

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 403030141 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00024-JBF-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998446266] [10-6988]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jimmy Simons v. Gene Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JIMMY EUGENE SIMONS
Represented By: Jimmy Eugene Simons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Represented By: THOMAS Drummond BAGWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?