Charles Stokes v. Andrew Moorman
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES MICHAEL STOKES
Defendant - Appellee: ANDREW MOORMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities
Case Number: 10-7411
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 4, 2011 Charles Stokes v. Andrew Moorman

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403137499 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 9:10-cv-01711-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998495542] [10-7411]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Stokes v. Andrew Moorman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHARLES MICHAEL STOKES
Represented By: Charles Michael Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: ANDREW MOORMAN, sued in his individual and official capacities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?