Clinton Smith v. Gerald Branker
Petitioner - Appellant: CLINTON SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: GERALD J. BRANKER, Administrator
Case Number: 10-7417
Filed: October 12, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 13, 2012 Clinton Smith v. Gerald Branker

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 403710172 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998451585-2] Originating case number: 5:09-hc-02082-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998764636]. Mailed to: David Weiss. [10-7417]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Clinton Smith v. Gerald Branker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: CLINTON SMITH
Represented By: David Weiss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: GERALD J. BRANKER, Administrator
Represented By: Valerie Blanche Spalding
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?