Satiro Williams v. Gregory Knowlin
Petitioner - Appellant: SATIRO WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee: GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden of Turbeville Correctional Institution
Case Number: 10-7469
Filed: October 21, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 6, 2011 Satiro Williams v. Gregory Knowlin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403280422 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 6:09-cv-03182-MBS Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998561886]. [10-7469]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Satiro Williams v. Gregory Knowlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: SATIRO WILLIAMS
Represented By: Satiro Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden of Turbeville Correctional Institution
Represented By: William Edgar Salter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?