Thomas Harley v. Warden, Broad River
Petitioner - Appellant: THOMAS HARLEY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Case Number: 10-7650
Filed: November 30, 2010
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 18, 2011 Thomas Harley v. Warden, Broad River

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403251070 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-2296-RBH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998548175]. Mailed to: Thomas Harley. [10-7650]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Harley v. Warden, Broad River
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: THOMAS HARLEY
Represented By: Thomas Harley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?