Friends of Back Bay et al v. US Army Corps of Eng et al
| FRIENDS OF BACK BAY and BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD |
| UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of The Army, ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and ANDREW W. BACKUS, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District |
| 11-1184 |
| March 2, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Friends of Back Bay, et al. v. US Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403949542
PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:10-cv-00270-HCM-TEM Paper copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998876828]. [11-1184]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Friends of Back Bay et al v. US Army Corps of Eng et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: FRIENDS OF BACK BAY | |
| Represented By: | Deborah M. Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: BACK BAY RESTORATION FOUNDATION, LTD | |
| Represented By: | Deborah M. Murray |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Klein Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of The Army | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Klein Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ROBERT L. VAN ANTWERP, Lieutenant General, in his official capacity as Chief of Engineers and Commanding General of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Klein Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: ANDREW W. BACKUS, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District | |
| Represented By: | Samantha Klein Frank |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
