Vanessa Curry v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of SC
| VANESSA WIMBERLY CURRY |
| BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA |
| 11-1492 |
| May 10, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Vanessa Curry v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of SC |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403444459
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:09-cv-02718-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998639001]. Mailed to: Vanessa Wimberly Curry. [11-1492]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vanessa Curry v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of SC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: VANESSA WIMBERLY CURRY | |
| Represented By: | Vanessa Wimberly Curry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF SOUTH CAROLINA | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Thomas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
