James Howard v. Lakeshore Equipment Company
| JAMES HOWARD |
| LAKESHORE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, d/b/a Lakeshore Learning Materials |
| 11-1772 |
| July 25, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| James Howard v. Lakeshore Equipment Company |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403933458
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:10-cv-00985-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998869341].. [11-1772]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Howard v. Lakeshore Equipment Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES HOWARD | |
| Represented By: | David A. Branch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: LAKESHORE EQUIPMENT COMPANY, d/b/a Lakeshore Learning Materials | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Nieman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
