Jane Doe v. Virginia Dept of State Police

Jane Doe v. Virginia Dept of State Police

Plaintiff - Appellant:	JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:	VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Colonel, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Virginia Department of State Police, SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD and J. GILBERT SEAUX, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the School Board of the Spotsylvania County Schools
Case Number:	11-1841
Filed:	August 9, 2011
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed	Description
April 12, 2013	Doe v. Virginia Dept. of State Police
April 16, 2013	Jane Doe v. Virginia Dep't of State Police
June 20, 2013	Jane Doe v. Virginia Department of State Police

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 20, 2013	Filing 404500948 Published Court order filed [999134563] denying Motion for rehearing and rehearing en banc [999105720-2]. Copies to all parties. [11-1841]
April 16, 2013	Filing 404401811 AMENDING ORDER/OPINION filed [999088169] amending and superseding Published Authored Opinion [999085769-2]. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00533-JAG. Copies to all parties. [11-1841]
April 12, 2013	Filing 404396717 PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00533-JAG Paper copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999085769]. [11-1841]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jane Doe v. Virginia Dept of State Police
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JANE DOE
Represented By:	Marvin David Miller
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE
Represented By:	Charles Antony Quagliato
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: W. STEVEN FLAHERTY, Colonel, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Virginia Department of State Police
Represented By:	Charles Antony Quagliato
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SPOTSYLVANIA COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Represented By:	Medford Jennings Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: J. GILBERT SEAUX, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the School Board of the Spotsylvania County Schools
Represented By:	Medford Jennings Brown
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?