Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen

Plaintiff - Appellant: CHANDER KANT and ASHIMA K. KANT
Defendant - Appellee: JAY L. COHEN
Case Number: 11-1844
Filed: August 10, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
March 8, 2012 Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 8, 2012 403796648 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:08-cv-00318-RWT Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998805428]. Mailed to: appellant Ashima K. Kant and appellee Jay L. Cohen. [11-1844]
Search for this case: Chander Kant v. Jay Cohen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CHANDER KANT
Represented By: Chander Kant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ASHIMA K. KANT
Represented By: Ashima K. Kant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JAY L. COHEN
Represented By: Deborah Murrell Whelihan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.