In re: 2703(d) Application
In re: APPLICATION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 2703(D) |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
JACOB APPELBAUM, ROP GONGGRIJP and BIRGITTA JONSDOTTIR |
TWITTER, INCORPORATED |
11-5151 |
December 7, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 DISTRICT COURT UPDATE. ORDERED that Petitioners' Motion to Stay and Injunction Pending Appeal [89] be and is hereby DENIED. Because resolution of this motion requires no argument, the Clerk shall remove the hearing set for 1/13/2011 from the calendar. Signed by District Judge L [11-5151] (JB) |
Filing 13 DOCKETING STATEMENT by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir. [11-5151] Aden Fine |
Filing 6 ORDER filed [998748799] granting Motion to extend filing time [5], updating/ resuming briefing order deadlines. Opening brief and appendix due 01/20/2012. Response brief due 02/14/2012 Copies to all parties... [11-5151] (MR) |
Filing 5 MOTION by Appellants Jacob Appelbaum, Rop Gonggrijp and Birgitta Jonsdottir to extend filing time for briefing schedule until January 20, 2012 for the opening brief and appendix; February 14, 2012 for Appellee's response brief; ten days after service of Appellee's brief for Appellants' reply brief. Date and method of service: 12/20/2011 ecf [998748401] [11-5151] Aden Fine |
Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Originating case number: 1:11-dm-00003-TCB-LO. Date notice of appeal filed: 11/23/2011. Case manager: MRadday. [11-5151] (MR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.