Sterling Roseboro v. US
Petitioner - Appellant: STERLING RAFAEL ROSEBORO, a/k/a Baldy
Respondent - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 11-6102
Filed: January 25, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 27, 2011 Sterling Roseboro v. US

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403312124 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [998524855-2] Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00391-FDW-4,3:09-cv-00553-FDW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998576933]. Mailed to: Sterling Roseboro. [11-6102]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sterling Roseboro v. US
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: STERLING RAFAEL ROSEBORO, a/k/a Baldy
Represented By: Sterling Rafael Roseboro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jennifer Lynn Dillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?