Melvin Dodson v. Warden, Deerfield Corr. Ctr.
| MELVIN CORNNELL DODSON |
| WARDEN, DEERFIELD CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
| 11-6202 |
| February 11, 2011 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Melvin Dodson v. Warden, Deerfield Corr. Ctr. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
403366534
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:10-cv-00019-jlk-mfu. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998602306] Mailed to: Melvin Cornnell Dodson. [11-6202]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Melvin Dodson v. Warden, Deerfield Corr. Ctr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: MELVIN CORNNELL DODSON | |
| Represented By: | Melvin Cornnell Dodson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: WARDEN, DEERFIELD CORRECTIONAL CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Beatty Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
