John Carroll v. Director of Department of Corr
Petitioner - Appellant: JOHN JAY CARROLL
Respondent - Appellee: DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Case Number: 11-6312
Filed: March 7, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 21, 2011 John Carroll v. Director of Department of Corr

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 403396003 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00185-CMH-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998616049]. Mailed to: Carroll. [11-6312]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: John Carroll v. Director of Department of Corr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: JOHN JAY CARROLL
Represented By: John Jay Carroll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Mark R. Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?