William Floyd v. Robert Stevenson
WILLIAM PATRICK FLOYD |
ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden Broad River |
11-6659 |
May 19, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
William Floyd v. Robert Stevenson |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 403589946 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion certificate of appealability (Local Rule 22(a)) [998599264-2]; denying updating certificate of appealability status Originating case number: 3:10-cv-00924-JFA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998707916]. Mailed to: appellant. [11-6659] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Floyd v. Robert Stevenson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: WILLIAM PATRICK FLOYD | |
Represented By: | William Patrick Floyd |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden Broad River | |
Represented By: | Melody Jane Brown |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.