Russell Moore v. Robert Stevenson
RUSSELL DARRYL MOORE |
ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden |
11-6915 |
July 20, 2011 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Russell Moore v. Robert Stevenson |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 403627258 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998661494-2]; denying Motion for transcript at government expense [998654822-2] Originating case number: 0:10-cv-01413-JMC. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998725912]. Mailed to: Russell Moore. [11-6915] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Russell Moore v. Robert Stevenson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: RUSSELL DARRYL MOORE | |
Represented By: | Russell Darryl Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: ROBERT STEVENSON, Warden | |
Represented By: | William Edgar Salter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.