Richard Washington v. Sheriff John Newhart
| RICHARD WASHINGTON |
| JOHN R. NEWHART, In his Individual and official capacity and JAMES O'SULLIVAN, Capacity as Colonel with the Sheriff's Office of the City of Chesapeake |
| 12-1473 |
| April 16, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Washington v. Sheriff John Newhart | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RICHARD WASHINGTON | |
| Represented By: | Richard Washington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: JOHN R. NEWHART, In his Individual and official capacity | |
| Represented By: | Neil S. Talegaonkar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: JAMES O'SULLIVAN, Capacity as Colonel with the Sheriff's Office of the City of Chesapeake | |
| Represented By: | Neil S. Talegaonkar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
