Sheet Metal Workers Intl Assn v. Maximum Air Flow Co.
| SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Local 399, AFL-CIO |
| MAXIMUM AIR FLOW CO. |
| 12-1981 |
| August 13, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Labor/Management Relations Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Sheet Metal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. James McLemore |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404671281
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:07-cv-02912-CWH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999214229].. [12-1981]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sheet Metal Workers Intl Assn v. Maximum Air Flow Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: SHEET METAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Local 399, AFL-CIO | |
| Represented By: | Arlus Stephens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: MAXIMUM AIR FLOW CO. | |
| Represented By: | Christopher Wofford Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
