Elliott Haines, III v. Patrick Donahoe
| ELLIOTT HAINES, III |
| PATRICK A. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States |
| 12-2325 |
| October 25, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Elliott Haines, III v. Patrick Donahoe |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404598222
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00293-ELH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999180101]. Mailed to: Elliott Haines III. [12-2325]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Elliott Haines, III v. Patrick Donahoe | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ELLIOTT HAINES, III | |
| Represented By: | Elliott Haines |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: PATRICK A. DONAHOE, Postmaster General of the United States | |
| Represented By: | Thomas Harold Barnard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
