Julio Ernesto Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
| JULIO ERNESTO MARTINEZ, a/k/a Julio Martinez |
| ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General |
| 12-2424 |
| November 26, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Martinez v. Holder, Jr.
|
|
Julio Ernesto Martinez v. Eric H. Holder
|
|
Julio Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404822137
REVISED OPINION filed [999285208] amending and superseding prior opinion Originating case number: A095-042-745 Copies to all parties.. [12-2424]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Julio Ernesto Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JULIO ERNESTO MARTINEZ, a/k/a Julio Martinez | |
| Represented By: | Maureen A. Sweeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
