US v. Dean Sawyer
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: DEAN CURTIS SAWYER
Case Number: 12-6772
Filed: April 26, 2012
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 26, 2012 US v. Dean Sawyer

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 404005185 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying updating certificate of appealability status Originating case number: 2:07-cr-00125-RBS-TEM-5,2:09-cv-00634-RBS. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [998902723]. Mailed to: Dean Sawyer. [12-6772]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: US v. Dean Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Laura Pellatiro Tayman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: DEAN CURTIS SAWYER
Represented By: Dean Curtis Sawyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?