US v. Kelvin Spott
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty |
| 12-7568 |
| September 14, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404569618
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to remand case [999111849-2]; denying Motion to stay proceedings and to recall the mandate in other case [999142074-2] Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00047-1,3:12-cv-00354 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999166611]. Mailed to: Kelvin Spotts. [12-7568]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Kelvin Spott | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | John J. Frail |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty | |
| Represented By: | Kelvin Andre Spotts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
