Robert Shell v. Harold Clarke
| ROBERT EDWARD LEE SHELL |
| HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
| 12-7730 |
| October 9, 2012 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404377184
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion dispositions in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [998978771-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [998994912-2]; denying Motion to supplement [998994918-3]. Originating case number: 7:11-cv-00363-GEC-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999076677]. Mailed to: Robert Shell. [12-7730]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Shell v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: ROBERT EDWARD LEE SHELL | |
| Represented By: | Robert Edward Lee Shell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | Eugene Paul Murphy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
