Michael Kanode, Sr. v. Derek Swope
MICHAEL J. KANODE, SR. |
DEREK C. SWOPE, Judge, SCOTT ASH, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, MIKE L. GILLS, Detective, MERCER COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL P. COOKE, MCGINNIS E. HATFIELD, JR., ANTHONY BISAHA, Family Court Judge, SHERRY KANODE, WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, and Child Protection Services, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA, SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC., SERGEANT MALISSA CLEMONS, KRISTA ELLISON, SERGEANT JOSE CENTENO, DEPUTY J. D. ELLISON, TIMOTHY BOGGESS, 120 Scott Street, Suite 200 Princeton, WV 24740 Prosecutor, DEBORAH GARTON, 120 Scott Street, Suite 200 Princeton, WV 24740, NISSA KAHLE, Mercer County Prosecutor's Office 120 Scott Street Princeton, WV 24740, DANNY RAY WILLS, Mercer County Sheriff's Dept. 1501 W. Main Street Princeton, WV 24740 Former Sheriff, TONIA HODGES, Mercer County Department of Health and Human Resources 200 Davis Street Princeton, WV 24740, MARSHA EDWARDS, Mercer County Department of Health and Human Resources 200 Davis Street Princeton, WV 24740 and ROBB MOTT, 200 12th Street Princeton, WV 24740 Commissioner of Southern Highlands Mental Health Community Center |
12-8005 |
November 28, 2012 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Michael Kanode, Sr. v. Derek Swope |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404272075 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-01530,1:10-cv-00407,1:12-cv-06068,1:12-cv-00157,1:11-cv-00994 Copies to all parties and the district court. [999027296]. Mailed to: Michael Kanode, Sr.. [12-8005] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.