Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

Plaintiff - Appellant: EARL BARNETT
Defendant - Appellee: US ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 13-1604
Filed: May 9, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 13, 2013 Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 13, 2013 404579225 Opinion or Order of the Court UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999171133]. Mailed to: Earl Barnett. [13-1604]
Search for this case: Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: EARL BARNETT
Represented By: Earl Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: US ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice
Represented By: Jarod James Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: Jarod James Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.