In re: Jose Humberto Diaz
| In re: JOSE HUMBERTO DIAZ, a/k/a Humberto Diaz |
| 13-1688 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404545334
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999118480-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [999118479-2]. Originating case number: 7:09-cr-00100-D-3,7:11-cv-00043-D. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999155338]. Mailed to: Jose Diaz. [13-1688]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In re: Jose Humberto Diaz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: JOSE HUMBERTO DIAZ, a/k/a Humberto Diaz | |
| Represented By: | Jose Humberto Diaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Represented By: | Michael Gordon James |
| Represented By: | Tobin Webb Lathan |
| Represented By: | Ethan A. Ontjes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
