Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Lee Farka
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
LEE BENTLEY FARKAS |
13-1757 |
June 12, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Securities, Commodities, Exchange |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee Farkas |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404842700 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [999281684-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00667-LMB-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999295031]. Mailed to: Lee Bentley Farkas. [13-1757] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Lee Farka | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION | |
Represented By: | Steven E. Gordon |
Represented By: | Mendy M. Piekarski |
Represented By: | Erica Yvette Williams |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: LEE BENTLEY FARKAS | |
Represented By: | Lee Bentley Farkas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.