Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Lee Farka

Plaintiff - Appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant: LEE BENTLEY FARKAS
Case Number: 13-1757
Filed: June 12, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Securities, Commodities, Exchange

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 11, 2014 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lee Farkas

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 404842700 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for abeyance (Local Rule 12(d)) [999281684-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00667-LMB-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999295031]. Mailed to: Lee Bentley Farkas. [13-1757]
Search for this case: Securities and Exchange Comm. v. Lee Farka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Represented By: Steven E. Gordon
Represented By: Mendy M. Piekarski
Represented By: Erica Yvette Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: LEE BENTLEY FARKAS
Represented By: Lee Bentley Farkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?