Melodie Shuler v. Tower Legal Staffing, Inc.
| MELODIE SHULER |
| TOWER LEGAL STAFFING, INC. |
| 13-1910 |
| July 22, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Melodie Shuler v. Tower Legal Staffing, Inc. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404874942
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999192610-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01684-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999309847]. Mailed to: Melodie Shuler. [13-1910]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Melodie Shuler v. Tower Legal Staffing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: MELODIE SHULER | |
| Represented By: | Melodie Shuler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: TOWER LEGAL STAFFING, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Gil A. Abramson |
| Represented By: | Eileen Carr Riley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
