Matthew Babb v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Petitioner: MATTHEW MILES BABB
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Case Number: 13-1973
Filed: August 5, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 3, 2013 Matthew Babb v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 404657890 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for stay pending appeal [999196157-2] Originating case number: A036-360-098. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999207793]. Mailed to: Matthew Babb. [13-1973]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Babb v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MATTHEW MILES BABB
Represented By: Matthew Miles Babb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: David H. Wetmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?