In re: Kelvin Spott
In re: KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty |
13-2503 |
December 26, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404926615 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999317268-2], denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999266679-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999276332-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999273641-2] Originating case number: 3:98-cr-00047-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999333890]. Mailed to: Kelvin Spotts. [13-2503] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Kelvin Spott | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS, a/k/a Shorty | |
Represented By: | Kelvin Andre Spotts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Represented By: | John J. Frail |
Represented By: | Steven Loew |
Represented By: | Richard Gregory McVey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.