In re: Jeremiah Sloan
Movant: In re: JEREMIAH WELDON SLOAN
:
Case Number: 13-288
Filed: June 25, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 6, 2014 In re: Jeremiah Sloan

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 404962729 UNPUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for authorization to file successive habeas application (Local Rule 22(d)) [999137646-2] Originating case number: 3:93-cr-00028-GCM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999350525].. [13-288]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Jeremiah Sloan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: In re: JEREMIAH WELDON SLOAN
Represented By: Jacob H. Sussman
Represented By: Noell Peter Tin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Amy Elizabeth Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?