US v. Florentino Castaneda-Pelaez
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
FLORENTINO CASTANEDA-PELAEZ, a/k/a Florentino Castanada-Palaez, a/k/a Alejandro Mendoza-Rivielo |
13-4283 |
April 15, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
US v. Florentino Castaneda-Pelaez |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404718719 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cr-00390-NCT-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999236767].. [13-4283] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Florentino Castaneda-Pelaez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Arnold L. Husser |
Represented By: | Kyle David Pousson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: FLORENTINO CASTANEDA-PELAEZ, a/k/a Florentino Castanada-Palaez, a/k/a Alejandro Mendoza-Rivielo | |
Represented By: | Corey D. Buggs |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.