US v. Jose Bran
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| JOSE ARMANDO BRAN, a/k/a Pantro |
| 13-4634 |
| August 30, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 United States v. Bran
|
|
US v. Jose Bran
|
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405316771
AMENDED OPINION filed amending and superseding opinion dated 01/22/2015. Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00131-REP-1. Copies to all parties.. [13-4634]
|
|
Filing
405314026
PUBLISHED AUTHORED OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cr-00131-REP-1. [999514978]. [13-4634]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Jose Bran | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Lamont Creighton |
| Represented By: | Roderick Charles Young |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: JOSE ARMANDO BRAN, a/k/a Pantro | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Virginia Grady |
| Represented By: | Mary Elizabeth Maguire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
