US v. Cirilo Serrano-Manehen
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CIRILO SERRANO-MANEHEN, a/k/a Jesus Flores Lopez, a/k/a Cirilo Maneche Serrano, a/k/a Edwardio Blanco Torra, a/k/a Jose Manuel Renteria Galeana, a/k/a Jose Renteria Galeana |
13-4702 |
September 20, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404996765 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cr-00131-CCE-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999366622]. [13-4702] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: US v. Cirilo Serrano-Manehen | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Kyle David Pousson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: CIRILO SERRANO-MANEHEN, a/k/a Jesus Flores Lopez, a/k/a Cirilo Maneche Serrano, a/k/a Edwardio Blanco Torra, a/k/a Jose Manuel Renteria Galeana, a/k/a Jose Renteria Galeana | |
Represented By: | Scott L. Wilkinson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.