Quentin Sullivan v. Anthony Padula
Petitioner - Appellant: QUENTIN MARQUISE SULLIVAN
Respondent - Appellee: ANTHONY PADULA
Case Number: 13-6543
Filed: April 9, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 26, 2013 Quentin Sullivan v. Anthony Padula

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 404598517 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-02045-MGL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999180229].. [13-6543]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Quentin Sullivan v. Anthony Padula
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: QUENTIN MARQUISE SULLIVAN
Represented By: Quentin Marquise Sullivan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: ANTHONY PADULA
Represented By: William Edgar Salter
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?