Edward Bragg v. Harold Clarke
| EDWARD LEBRON BRAGG |
| HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections |
| 13-7193 |
| July 25, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404725363
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999176050-2]; denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999176052-2]. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00161-RAJ-LRL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999239856]. Mailed to: Edward Bragg. [13-7193]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Edward Bragg v. Harold Clarke | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner - appellant: EDWARD LEBRON BRAGG | |
| Represented By: | Edward Lebron Bragg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent - appellee: HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections | |
| Represented By: | John Michael Parsons |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
