Glenn Yow v. Danny Haye
Petitioner - Appellant: GLENN SCOTT YOW
Respondent - Appellee: DANNY HAYES
Case Number: 13-7196
Filed: July 25, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 21, 2013 Glenn Yow v. Danny Hayes

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 404687723 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999176504-2]. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00283-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999221868]. Mailed to: Glenn Yow. [13-7196]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Glenn Yow v. Danny Haye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: GLENN SCOTT YOW
Represented By: Glenn Scott Yow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: DANNY HAYES
Represented By: Clarence Joe DelForge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?