Robert Clay v. State of North Carolina
Petitioner - Appellant: ROBERT LYNN CLAY
Respondent - Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case Number: 13-7213
Filed: July 30, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 21, 2014 Robert Clay v. State of North Carolina

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 405110171 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999171871-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01010-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999420272]. Mailed to: Robert Clay. [13-7213]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Clay v. State of North Carolina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: ROBERT LYNN CLAY
Represented By: Robert Lynn Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Represented By: Clarence Joe DelForge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?