Kalvin Smith v. Todd Pinion
Petitioner - Appellant: KALVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: TODD PINION, Superintendent
Case Number: 13-7325
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 23, 2014 Kalvin Smith v. Todd Pinion

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 404815245 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00029-CCE-LPA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999282147]. [13-7325]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kalvin Smith v. Todd Pinion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner - appellant: KALVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Represented By: David Christopher Pishko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent - appellee: TODD PINION, Superintendent
Represented By: Clarence Joe DelForge
Represented By: Danielle Marquis Elder
Represented By: Mary Carla Hollis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?