Courtney Lyles v. Robert Bollinger
COURTNEY LYLES |
ROBERT BOLLINGER, Interim Warden |
13-7557 |
September 25, 2013 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Courtney Lyles v. Robert Bollinger |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 404874798 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint/assign counsel [999223890-2]; denying Motion for a federal hearing [999223900-2]; denying for certificate of appealability Originating case number: 9:12-cv-01667-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999309787]. Mailed to: Lyles. [13-7557] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Courtney Lyles v. Robert Bollinger | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner - appellant: COURTNEY LYLES | |
Represented By: | Courtney Lyles |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent - appellee: ROBERT BOLLINGER, Interim Warden | |
Represented By: | Brendan McDonald |
Represented By: | Donald John Zelenka |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.