US v. Michael Proctor, Jr.
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MICHAEL WARREN PROCTOR, JR., a/k/a Michael Warran Proctor, a/k/a Marcus Jalen Taylor |
| 13-7915 |
| November 27, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404862561
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cr-00274-GBL-1,1:11-cv-01396-GBL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999304264]. Mailed to: Michael Proctor, Jr.. [13-7915]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: US v. Michael Proctor, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Leonor V. Davila |
| Represented By: | Dennis Michael Fitzpatrick |
| Represented By: | Kathryn R. Haun |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellant: MICHAEL WARREN PROCTOR, JR., a/k/a Michael Warran Proctor, a/k/a Marcus Jalen Taylor | |
| Represented By: | Michael Warren Proctor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.