Richard Tucker v. Russell Helbig
| RICHARD PRICE TUCKER |
| CHAPLAIN RUSSELL HELBIG, sued in his personal-individual capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief |
| 13-7981 |
| December 13, 2013 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
404937348
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:13-cv-00401-RMG. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999338964]. Mailed to: Richard Tucker. [13-7981]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Tucker v. Russell Helbig | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: RICHARD PRICE TUCKER | |
| Represented By: | Richard Price Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: CHAPLAIN RUSSELL HELBIG, sued in his personal-individual capacity and in his official capacity for injunctive relief | |
| Represented By: | Barbara Murcier Bowens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
