Gregory Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREGORY KANE
Defendant - Appellee: UPS PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Case Number: 14-1032
Filed: January 13, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Employee Retirement

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 1, 2014 Gregory Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 405167658 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03719-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999446782].. [14-1032]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gregory Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: GREGORY KANE
Represented By: Denise M. Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UPS PENSION PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Represented By: John Timothy McDonald
Represented By: C. Dennis Southard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?