Marvin Antonio Obando v. Eric Holder, Jr.
| MARVIN ANTONIO OBANDO, a/k/a Marvin Antonio Toledo |
| ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General |
| 14-1312 |
| April 7, 2014 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Marvin Obando v. Eric Holder, Jr. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
405272768
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A042-480-275 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999495906].. [14-1312]
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marvin Antonio Obando v. Eric Holder, Jr. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: MARVIN ANTONIO OBANDO, a/k/a Marvin Antonio Toledo | |
| Represented By: | Timothy William Davis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | William Charles Peachey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
