Sharon Adams v. Carolyn Colvin
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHARON RADFORD ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number: 14-1555
Filed: June 10, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W.

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 5, 2015 Sharon Adams v. Carolyn Colvin

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405572059 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-00019-FDW-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999634573].. [14-1555]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sharon Adams v. Carolyn Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: SHARON RADFORD ADAMS
Represented By: Russell Ray Bowling
Represented By: Paul Bradford Eaglin
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By: Marcelo Nelson Illarmo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?