Milton N. Ward, III v. US Dept of Education
MILTON N. WARD, III |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION |
14-1839 |
August 19, 2014 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit |
Bankruptcy Appeals Rule 28 USC 158 |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Milton Ward, III v. US Dep't of Education |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 405277899 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999428792-2] Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00695-D Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999498177]. Mailed to: Ward. [14-1839] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Milton N. Ward, III v. US Dept of Education | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: MILTON N. WARD, III | |
Represented By: | Milton N. Ward |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION | |
Represented By: | Joshua Bryan Royster |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.