Timothy Best v. Cequel
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY DEAN BEST
Defendant - Appellee: CEQUEL, and parent Suddenlink Communication, LLC and their employees
Case Number: 14-2379
Filed: December 18, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 19, 2015 Timothy Best v. Cequel

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 405387567 UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:14-cv-00061-FL. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999549223]. Mailed to: Timothy Best. [14-2379]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Timothy Best v. Cequel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: TIMOTHY DEAN BEST
Represented By: Timothy Dean Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CEQUEL, and parent Suddenlink Communication, LLC and their employees
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?